Normally, when a ship is about to smash itself upon the craggy coast of, say, a nineteenth century New England village during a nor’easter, the black rats aboard would be wily enough to read the warning signs in time to jump ship and attempt to save themselves by swimming through the swells.
Not so, apparently, with the Baseball Writers of America (BBWAA), America’s last bastion of discomfiting morality. Just as the S.S. Hall Ballot 2013 set sail, the BBWAA rats began to puncture holes in their own vessel, now listing dangerously to port-side before they’d even left port. And more of them continue to climb aboard, though it should be obvious by now that their (nautical) position, (like Dave Kingman playing third base), is untenable.
How else to account for the inevitable shipwreck-of-a-ballot being buffeted around like a latter-day Pequod doing battle with the GREAT WHITE WHALE of our time, steroids?
Wait a minute. Aren’t the writers — those sportswriters lucky enough to actually receive a ballot (in a newspaper industry, mind you, with about as much of a future as a harpooner) — simply supposed to vote for the best players of the past decade or so whose names now appear on ballot? When did the baseball writers, an old-time boys club not to be mistaken for a boy’s choir, become the Maginot Line of virtue in our society?
Yet moralize they will once their ballots are submitted on January 9th.
Some of them will tell you it’s simply wrong to allow cheaters into The Hall of Fame even though plenty of cheaters are already in there. They will argue that to let in a Barry Bonds or a Roger Clemens will turn the Hall’s Plaque Room into an atrocity, akin to burying Napoleon’s remains in Westminster Abbey (well, they probably won’t come up with that one, I suppose, though they’ll wish they had.)
Yet the Hall has withstood the induction of a KKK member, Tris Speaker, as well as the enshrinement of such other virulent racists as Cap Anson and Ty Cobb, to name just two of probably many.
Gaylord Perry was an admitted cheater. He even wrote a popular book about cheating called, “Me and the Spitter.”
Leo Durocher, while managing the Giants in ’51, had his players utilize a complex set of mirrors and a German-made telescope to steal the signs of opposing pitchers in the second half of the ’51 season, up to and including the pennant deciding game in which Bobby Thomson probably knew what Ralph Branca was about to throw before he hit the legendary (probably tainted) home run.
Don Sutton and Whitey Ford were said by many to have regularly scuffed the ball.
And as for Performance Enhancing Drugs, “Greenies” don’t count? Mike Schmidt and Hank Aaron were both admitted users of “Greenies” and Willie Mays probably used them as well. “Greenies” have been specifically banned from baseball since 1971. They might not have enabled a player to hit a ball further or to throw it harder, but they did allow the player to continue to perform at peak performance when their body otherwise might not have been able to. That is the same purpose for which Mark McGwire claims to have used PED’s.
Meanwhile, even if none of those reasons impress you very much or cause you to take a second look at PED use, consider this. It’s probable that at least one or two PED users are already in The Hall. The taint has probably already occurred. If PED use really began to manifest itself in the Majors in the early to mid-1980’s, this means that for around twenty years now, the BBWAA has been inducting players who could conceivably have used PED’s. Given the large number of stars who’ve now been linked to PED’s (either by leak, personal admission, or circumstantial evidence) over the past 20 years, is it inconceivable that some of their peers already in The Hall might also have been users?
Consider, as well, that the despite the “best” intentions of the BBWAA over the next decade, almost certainly at least a couple more PED users will be enshrined. The alternative is that NO players will be enshrined, and despite the Baseball HOF’s best efforts at appearing Regal and Above the Fray on this issue, no organization will squawk louder than The Hall will when NO player is inducted into The Hall for several years running.
We’re talking big bucks on the line here for The Hall’s big, annual Induction Weekend. No induction, no big crowds. No big crowds, a lot less money coming into the town coffers. (Current Hall Chairwoman Jane Forbes Clark, whose family owns just about all that is worth owning in Cooperstown, would not be happy about that.)
Finally, there is the long-term issue of the continued relevance and viability of a HOF which excludes virtually all of the significant record holders and award winners of an entire generation of players. Consider List A and List B, for a moment:
George “High Pockets” Kelly
That’s a list of 15 players who are actually in the HOF.
Now let’s take a look at List B:
Virtually every player on List B is better than every player on list A, yet there’s a very real chance that NONE of the players on List B will be elected this year, and that perhaps only 2 or 3 will be elected in coming years. Granted, not all of these players suffer from the scarlet letter of Steroids.
Yet, from both a historical standpoint as well as from a perspective of pure entertainment, obviously far more fans (despite their misgivings about any particular player) would prefer to visit Hall Plaque Room B over Hall Plaque Room A. And certainly the players on List B were both more talented and, therefore, more Hall-worthy than List A. So, the question arises, how irrelevant do we want to allow The Hall of Fame to become?
Which players from List B (and let’s add Jack Morris, Dale Murphy, and Don Mattingly to round out our ballot) would you vote for? Remember, you can vote for up to ten players. Which ones would you choose not to vote for, and why?
Happy New Year,